PhysLean/HepLean/SpaceTime/LorentzTensor/IndexNotation/TensorIndex.lean
2024-08-14 16:55:13 -04:00

509 lines
19 KiB
Text
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Joseph Tooby-Smith. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Tooby-Smith
-/
import HepLean.SpaceTime.LorentzTensor.IndexNotation.Indices.Color
import HepLean.SpaceTime.LorentzTensor.IndexNotation.Indices.Relations
import HepLean.SpaceTime.LorentzTensor.Basic
import HepLean.SpaceTime.LorentzTensor.RisingLowering
import HepLean.SpaceTime.LorentzTensor.Contraction
/-!
# The structure of a tensor with a string of indices
-/
/-! TODO: Introduce a way to change an index from e.g. `ᵘ¹` to `ᵘ²`.
Would be nice to have a tactic that did this automatically. -/
namespace TensorStructure
noncomputable section
open TensorColor
open IndexNotation
variable {R : Type} [CommSemiring R] (𝓣 : TensorStructure R)
variable {d : } {X Y Y' Z W : Type} [Fintype X] [DecidableEq X] [Fintype Y] [DecidableEq Y]
[Fintype Y'] [DecidableEq Y'] [Fintype Z] [DecidableEq Z] [Fintype W] [DecidableEq W]
{cX cX2 : X → 𝓣.Color} {cY : Y → 𝓣.Color} {cZ : Z → 𝓣.Color}
{cW : W → 𝓣.Color} {cY' : Y' → 𝓣.Color} {μ ν η : 𝓣.Color}
variable [IndexNotation 𝓣.Color] [Fintype 𝓣.Color] [DecidableEq 𝓣.Color]
/-- The structure an tensor with a index specification e.g. `ᵘ¹ᵤ₂`. -/
structure TensorIndex extends ColorIndexList 𝓣.toTensorColor where
/-- The underlying tensor. -/
tensor : 𝓣.Tensor toColorIndexList.colorMap'
namespace TensorIndex
open TensorColor ColorIndexList
variable {𝓣 : TensorStructure R} [IndexNotation 𝓣.Color] [Fintype 𝓣.Color] [DecidableEq 𝓣.Color]
variable {n m : } {cn : Fin n → 𝓣.Color} {cm : Fin m → 𝓣.Color}
instance : Coe 𝓣.TensorIndex (ColorIndexList 𝓣.toTensorColor) where
coe T := T.toColorIndexList
lemma colormap_mapIso {T₁ T₂ : 𝓣.TensorIndex} (hi : T₁.toColorIndexList = T₂.toColorIndexList) :
ColorMap.MapIso (Fin.castOrderIso (by simp [IndexList.length, hi])).toEquiv
T₁.colorMap' T₂.colorMap' := by
cases T₁; cases T₂
simp [ColorMap.MapIso]
simp at hi
rename_i a b c d
cases a
cases c
rename_i a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6
cases a1
cases a4
simp_all
simp at hi
subst hi
rfl
lemma ext {T₁ T₂ : 𝓣.TensorIndex} (hi : T₁.toColorIndexList = T₂.toColorIndexList)
(h : T₁.tensor = 𝓣.mapIso (Fin.castOrderIso (by simp [IndexList.length, hi])).toEquiv
(colormap_mapIso hi.symm) T₂.tensor) : T₁ = T₂ := by
cases T₁; cases T₂
simp at h
simp_all
simp at hi
subst hi
simp_all
lemma index_eq_of_eq {T₁ T₂ : 𝓣.TensorIndex} (h : T₁ = T₂) :
T₁.toColorIndexList = T₂.toColorIndexList := by
cases h
rfl
@[simp]
lemma tensor_eq_of_eq {T₁ T₂ : 𝓣.TensorIndex} (h : T₁ = T₂) : T₁.tensor =
𝓣.mapIso (Fin.castOrderIso (by rw [index_eq_of_eq h])).toEquiv
(colormap_mapIso (index_eq_of_eq h).symm) T₂.tensor := by
have hi := index_eq_of_eq h
cases T₁
cases T₂
simp at hi
subst hi
simpa using h
/-- The construction of a `TensorIndex` from a tensor, a IndexListColor, and a condition
on the dual maps. -/
def mkDualMap (T : 𝓣.Tensor cn) (l : ColorIndexList 𝓣.toTensorColor) (hn : n = l.1.length)
(hd : ColorMap.DualMap l.colorMap' (cn ∘ Fin.cast hn.symm)) :
𝓣.TensorIndex where
toColorIndexList := l
tensor :=
𝓣.mapIso (Equiv.refl _) (ColorMap.DualMap.split_dual' (by simpa using hd)) <|
𝓣.dualize (ColorMap.DualMap.split l.colorMap' (cn ∘ Fin.cast hn.symm)) <|
(𝓣.mapIso (Fin.castOrderIso hn).toEquiv rfl T : 𝓣.Tensor (cn ∘ Fin.cast hn.symm))
/-!
## The contraction of indices
-/
/-- The contraction of indices in a `TensorIndex`. -/
def contr (T : 𝓣.TensorIndex) : 𝓣.TensorIndex where
toColorIndexList := T.toColorIndexList.contr
tensor := 𝓣.mapIso (Equiv.refl _) T.contrEquiv_colorMapIso <|
𝓣.contr T.toColorIndexList.contrEquiv T.contrEquiv_contrCond T.tensor
/-- Applying contr to a tensor whose indices has no contracts does not do anything. -/
@[simp]
lemma contr_of_withDual_empty (T : 𝓣.TensorIndex) (h : T.withDual = ∅) :
T.contr = T := by
refine ext ?_ ?_
· simp [contr, ColorIndexList.contr]
have hx := T.contrIndexList_of_withDual_empty h
apply ColorIndexList.ext
simp [hx]
· simp only [contr]
cases T
rename_i i T
simp only
refine PiTensorProduct.induction_on' T ?_ (by
intro a b hx hy
simp [map_add, add_mul, hx, hy])
intro r f
simp only [PiTensorProduct.tprodCoeff_eq_smul_tprod, LinearMapClass.map_smul, mapIso_tprod, id_eq,
eq_mpr_eq_cast, OrderIso.toEquiv_symm, RelIso.coe_fn_toEquiv]
apply congrArg
have hEm : IsEmpty { x // x ∈ i.withUniqueDualLT } := by
rw [Finset.isEmpty_coe_sort]
rw [Finset.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
intro x hx
have hx' : x ∈ i.withUniqueDual := by
exact Finset.mem_of_mem_filter x hx
rw [i.unique_duals] at h
rw [h] at hx'
simp_all
erw [TensorStructure.contr_tprod_isEmpty]
erw [mapIso_tprod]
simp only [Equiv.refl_symm, Equiv.refl_apply, colorMap', mapIso_tprod, id_eq,
OrderIso.toEquiv_symm, RelIso.coe_fn_toEquiv]
apply congrArg
funext l
rw [← LinearEquiv.symm_apply_eq]
simp only [colorModuleCast, Equiv.cast_symm, OrderIso.toEquiv_symm, RelIso.coe_fn_toEquiv,
Function.comp_apply, LinearEquiv.coe_mk, Equiv.cast_apply, LinearEquiv.coe_symm_mk, cast_cast]
apply cast_eq_iff_heq.mpr
let hl := i.contrEquiv_on_withDual_empty l h
exact let_value_heq f hl
@[simp]
lemma contr_contr (T : 𝓣.TensorIndex) : T.contr.contr = T.contr :=
T.contr.contr_of_withDual_empty (by simp [contr, ColorIndexList.contr])
@[simp]
lemma contr_toColorIndexList (T : 𝓣.TensorIndex) : T.contr.toColorIndexList = T.toColorIndexList.contr := rfl
@[simp]
lemma contr_toIndexList (T : 𝓣.TensorIndex) : T.contr.toIndexList = T.toIndexList.contrIndexList := rfl
/-!
## Scalar multiplication of
-/
/-- The scalar multiplication of a `TensorIndex` by an element of `R`. -/
instance : SMul R 𝓣.TensorIndex where
smul := fun r T => {
toColorIndexList := T.toColorIndexList
tensor := r • T.tensor}
@[simp]
lemma smul_index (r : R) (T : 𝓣.TensorIndex) : (r • T).toColorIndexList = T.toColorIndexList := rfl
@[simp]
lemma smul_tensor (r : R) (T : 𝓣.TensorIndex) : (r • T).tensor = r • T.tensor := rfl
@[simp]
lemma smul_contr (r : R) (T : 𝓣.TensorIndex) : (r • T).contr = r • T.contr := by
refine ext rfl ?_
simp only [contr, smul_index, smul_tensor, LinearMapClass.map_smul, Fin.castOrderIso_refl,
OrderIso.refl_toEquiv, mapIso_refl, LinearEquiv.refl_apply]
/-!
## Equivalence relation on `TensorIndex`
-/
/-- An (equivalence) relation on two `TensorIndex`.
The point in this equivalence relation is that certain things (like the
permutation of indices, the contraction of indices, or rising or lowering indices) can be placed
in the indices or moved to the tensor itself. These two descriptions are equivalent. -/
def Rel (T₁ T₂ : 𝓣.TensorIndex) : Prop :=
T₁.ContrPerm T₂ ∧ ∀ (h : T₁.ContrPerm T₂),
T₁.contr.tensor = 𝓣.mapIso (contrPermEquiv h).symm (contrPermEquiv_colorMap_iso h) T₂.contr.tensor
namespace Rel
/-- Rel is reflexive. -/
lemma refl (T : 𝓣.TensorIndex) : Rel T T := by
apply And.intro
simp
simp
/-- Rel is symmetric. -/
lemma symm {T₁ T₂ : 𝓣.TensorIndex} (h : Rel T₁ T₂) : Rel T₂ T₁ := by
apply And.intro h.1.symm
intro h'
rw [← mapIso_symm]
symm
erw [LinearEquiv.symm_apply_eq]
rw [h.2]
apply congrFun
congr
exact h'.symm
/-- Rel is transitive. -/
lemma trans {T₁ T₂ T₃ : 𝓣.TensorIndex} (h1 : Rel T₁ T₂) (h2 : Rel T₂ T₃) : Rel T₁ T₃ := by
apply And.intro ((h1.1.trans h2.1))
intro h
change _ = (𝓣.mapIso (contrPermEquiv (h1.1.trans h2.1)).symm _) T₃.contr.tensor
trans (𝓣.mapIso ((contrPermEquiv h1.1).trans (contrPermEquiv h2.1)).symm (by
simp
have h1 := contrPermEquiv_colorMap_iso (ContrPerm.symm (ContrPerm.trans h1.left h2.left))
rw [← ColorMap.MapIso.symm'] at h1
exact h1)) T₃.contr.tensor
swap
congr 1
simp only [contrPermEquiv_trans, contrPermEquiv_symm]
erw [← mapIso_trans]
simp only [LinearEquiv.trans_apply]
apply (h1.2 h1.1).trans
apply congrArg
exact h2.2 h2.1
/-- Rel forms an equivalence relation. -/
lemma isEquivalence : Equivalence (@Rel _ _ 𝓣 _) where
refl := Rel.refl
symm := Rel.symm
trans := Rel.trans
/-- The equality of tensors corresponding to related tensor indices. -/
lemma to_eq {T₁ T₂ : 𝓣.TensorIndex} (h : Rel T₁ T₂) :
T₁.contr.tensor = 𝓣.mapIso (contrPermEquiv h.1).symm (contrPermEquiv_colorMap_iso h.1) T₂.contr.tensor := h.2 h.1
end Rel
/-- The structure of a Setoid on `𝓣.TensorIndex` induced by `Rel`. -/
instance asSetoid : Setoid 𝓣.TensorIndex := ⟨Rel, Rel.isEquivalence⟩
/-- A tensor index is equivalent to its contraction. -/
lemma rel_contr (T : 𝓣.TensorIndex) : T ≈ T.contr := by
apply And.intro
simp
intro h
rw [tensor_eq_of_eq T.contr_contr]
simp only [contr_toColorIndexList, colorMap', contrPermEquiv_self_contr, OrderIso.toEquiv_symm,
Fin.symm_castOrderIso, mapIso_mapIso]
trans 𝓣.mapIso (Equiv.refl _) (by rfl) T.contr.tensor
simp only [contr_toColorIndexList, mapIso_refl, LinearEquiv.refl_apply]
rfl
lemma smul_equiv {T₁ T₂ : 𝓣.TensorIndex} (h : T₁ ≈ T₂) (r : R) : r • T₁ ≈ r • T₂ := by
apply And.intro h.1
intro h1
rw [tensor_eq_of_eq (smul_contr r T₁), tensor_eq_of_eq (smul_contr r T₂)]
simp only [contr_toColorIndexList, smul_index, Fin.castOrderIso_refl, OrderIso.refl_toEquiv,
mapIso_refl, smul_tensor, map_smul, LinearEquiv.refl_apply, contrPermEquiv_symm]
apply congrArg
exact h.2 h1
/-!
## Addition of allowed `TensorIndex`
-/
/-- The condition on tensors with indices for their addition to exists.
This condition states that the the indices of one tensor are exact permutations of indices
of another after contraction. This includes the id of the index and the color.
This condition is general enough to allow addition of e.g. `ψᵤ₁ᵤ₂ + φᵤ₂ᵤ₁`, but
will NOT allow e.g. `ψᵤ₁ᵤ₂ + φᵘ²ᵤ₁`. -/
def AddCond (T₁ T₂ : 𝓣.TensorIndex) : Prop := T₁.ContrPerm T₂
namespace AddCond
lemma to_PermContr {T₁ T₂ : 𝓣.TensorIndex} (h : AddCond T₁ T₂) :
T₁.toColorIndexList.ContrPerm T₂.toColorIndexList := h
@[symm]
lemma symm {T₁ T₂ : 𝓣.TensorIndex} (h : AddCond T₁ T₂) : AddCond T₂ T₁ := by
rw [AddCond] at h
exact h.symm
lemma refl (T : 𝓣.TensorIndex) : AddCond T T := ContrPerm.refl
lemma trans {T₁ T₂ T₃ : 𝓣.TensorIndex} (h1 : AddCond T₁ T₂) (h2 : AddCond T₂ T₃) :
AddCond T₁ T₃ := by
rw [AddCond] at h1 h2
exact h1.trans h2
lemma rel_left {T₁ T₁' T₂ : 𝓣.TensorIndex} (h : AddCond T₁ T₂) (h' : T₁ ≈ T₁') :
AddCond T₁' T₂ := h'.1.symm.trans h
lemma rel_right {T₁ T₂ T₂' : 𝓣.TensorIndex} (h : AddCond T₁ T₂) (h' : T₂ ≈ T₂') :
AddCond T₁ T₂' := h.trans h'.1
end AddCond
/-- The equivalence between indices after contraction given a `AddCond`. -/
@[simp]
def addCondEquiv {T₁ T₂ : 𝓣.TensorIndex} (h : AddCond T₁ T₂) :
Fin T₁.contr.length ≃ Fin T₂.contr.length := contrPermEquiv h
lemma addCondEquiv_colorMap {T₁ T₂ : 𝓣.TensorIndex} (h : AddCond T₁ T₂) :
ColorMap.MapIso (addCondEquiv h) T₁.contr.colorMap' T₂.contr.colorMap' :=
contrPermEquiv_colorMap_iso' h
/-- The addition of two `TensorIndex` given the condition that, after contraction,
their index lists are the same. -/
def add (T₁ T₂ : 𝓣.TensorIndex) (h : AddCond T₁ T₂) :
𝓣.TensorIndex where
toColorIndexList := T₂.toColorIndexList.contr
tensor := (𝓣.mapIso (addCondEquiv h) (addCondEquiv_colorMap h) T₁.contr.tensor) + T₂.contr.tensor
/-- Notation for addition of tensor indices. -/
notation:71 T₁ "+["h"]" T₂:72 => add T₁ T₂ h
namespace AddCond
lemma add_right {T₁ T₂ T₃ : 𝓣.TensorIndex} (h : AddCond T₁ T₃) (h' : AddCond T₂ T₃) :
AddCond T₁ (T₂ +[h'] T₃) := by
simpa only [AddCond, add] using h.rel_right T₃.rel_contr
lemma add_left {T₁ T₂ T₃ : 𝓣.TensorIndex} (h : AddCond T₁ T₂) (h' : AddCond T₂ T₃) :
AddCond (T₁ +[h] T₂) T₃ :=
(add_right h'.symm h).symm
lemma of_add_right' {T₁ T₂ T₃ : 𝓣.TensorIndex} {h' : AddCond T₂ T₃} (h : AddCond T₁ (T₂ +[h'] T₃)) :
AddCond T₁ T₃ := by
change T₁.AddCond T₃.contr at h
exact h.rel_right T₃.rel_contr.symm
lemma of_add_right {T₁ T₂ T₃ : 𝓣.TensorIndex} {h' : AddCond T₂ T₃} (h : AddCond T₁ (T₂ +[h'] T₃)) :
AddCond T₁ T₂ := h.of_add_right'.trans h'.symm
lemma of_add_left {T₁ T₂ T₃ : 𝓣.TensorIndex} {h' : AddCond T₁ T₂}
(h : AddCond (T₁ +[h'] T₂) T₃) : AddCond T₂ T₃ :=
(of_add_right' h.symm).symm
lemma of_add_left' {T₁ T₂ T₃ : 𝓣.TensorIndex} {h' : AddCond T₁ T₂}
(h : AddCond (T₁ +[h'] T₂) T₃) : AddCond T₁ T₃ :=
(of_add_right h.symm).symm
lemma add_left_of_add_right {T₁ T₂ T₃ : 𝓣.TensorIndex} {h' : AddCond T₂ T₃}
(h : AddCond T₁ (T₂ +[h'] T₃)) : AddCond (T₁ +[of_add_right h] T₂) T₃ := by
have h0 := ((of_add_right' h).trans h'.symm)
exact (h'.symm.add_right h0).symm
lemma add_right_of_add_left {T₁ T₂ T₃ : 𝓣.TensorIndex} {h' : AddCond T₁ T₂}
(h : AddCond (T₁ +[h'] T₂) T₃) : AddCond T₁ (T₂ +[of_add_left h] T₃) :=
(add_left (of_add_left h) (of_add_left' h).symm).symm
lemma add_comm {T₁ T₂ : 𝓣.TensorIndex} (h : AddCond T₁ T₂) :
AddCond (T₁ +[h] T₂) (T₂ +[h.symm] T₁) := by
apply add_right
apply add_left
exact h.symm
end AddCond
@[simp]
lemma add_toColorIndexList (T₁ T₂ : 𝓣.TensorIndex) (h : AddCond T₁ T₂) :
(add T₁ T₂ h).toColorIndexList = T₂.toColorIndexList.contr := rfl
@[simp]
lemma add_tensor (T₁ T₂ : 𝓣.TensorIndex) (h : AddCond T₁ T₂) :
(add T₁ T₂ h).tensor =
(𝓣.mapIso (addCondEquiv h) (addCondEquiv_colorMap h) T₁.contr.tensor) + T₂.contr.tensor := by rfl
/-- Scalar multiplication commutes with addition. -/
lemma smul_add (r : R) (T₁ T₂ : 𝓣.TensorIndex) (h : AddCond T₁ T₂) :
r • (T₁ +[h] T₂) = r • T₁ +[h] r • T₂ := by
refine ext rfl ?_
simp [add]
rw [tensor_eq_of_eq (smul_contr r T₁), tensor_eq_of_eq (smul_contr r T₂)]
simp only [smul_index, contr_toColorIndexList, Fin.castOrderIso_refl, OrderIso.refl_toEquiv,
mapIso_refl, smul_tensor, map_smul, LinearEquiv.refl_apply]
lemma add_withDual_empty (T₁ T₂ : 𝓣.TensorIndex) (h : AddCond T₁ T₂) :
(T₁ +[h] T₂).withDual = ∅ := by
simp [contr]
change T₂.toColorIndexList.contr.withDual = ∅
simp [ColorIndexList.contr]
@[simp]
lemma contr_add (T₁ T₂ : 𝓣.TensorIndex) (h : AddCond T₁ T₂) :
(T₁ +[h] T₂).contr = T₁ +[h] T₂ :=
contr_of_withDual_empty (T₁ +[h] T₂) (add_withDual_empty T₁ T₂ h)
@[simp]
lemma contr_add_tensor (T₁ T₂ : 𝓣.TensorIndex) (h : AddCond T₁ T₂) :
(T₁ +[h] T₂).contr.tensor =
𝓣.mapIso (Fin.castOrderIso (by rw [index_eq_of_eq (contr_add T₁ T₂ h)])).toEquiv
(colormap_mapIso (by simp)) (T₁ +[h] T₂).tensor :=
tensor_eq_of_eq (contr_add T₁ T₂ h)
lemma add_comm {T₁ T₂ : 𝓣.TensorIndex} (h : AddCond T₁ T₂) : T₁ +[h] T₂ ≈ T₂ +[h.symm] T₁ := by
apply And.intro h.add_comm
intro h
simp only [contr_toColorIndexList, add_toColorIndexList, contr_add_tensor, add_tensor,
addCondEquiv, map_add, mapIso_mapIso, colorMap', contrPermEquiv_symm]
rw [_root_.add_comm]
congr 1
· apply congrFun
apply congrArg
congr 1
rw [← contrPermEquiv_self_contr, ← contrPermEquiv_self_contr, contrPermEquiv_trans,
contrPermEquiv_trans]
· apply congrFun
apply congrArg
congr 1
rw [← contrPermEquiv_self_contr, ← contrPermEquiv_self_contr, contrPermEquiv_trans,
contrPermEquiv_trans]
open AddCond in
lemma add_rel_left {T₁ T₁' T₂ : 𝓣.TensorIndex} (h : AddCond T₁ T₂) (h' : T₁ ≈ T₁') :
T₁ +[h] T₂ ≈ T₁' +[h.rel_left h'] T₂ := by
apply And.intro ContrPerm.refl
intro h
simp only [contr_add_tensor, add_tensor, map_add]
congr 1
rw [h'.to_eq]
simp only [contr_toColorIndexList, add_toColorIndexList, colorMap', addCondEquiv,
contrPermEquiv_symm, mapIso_mapIso, contrPermEquiv_trans, contrPermEquiv_refl, Equiv.refl_symm,
mapIso_refl, LinearEquiv.refl_apply]
simp only [contr_toColorIndexList, add_toColorIndexList, colorMap', contrPermEquiv_refl,
Equiv.refl_symm, mapIso_refl, LinearEquiv.refl_apply]
open AddCond in
lemma add_rel_right {T₁ T₂ T₂' : 𝓣.TensorIndex} (h : AddCond T₁ T₂) (h' : T₂ ≈ T₂') :
T₁ +[h] T₂ ≈ T₁ +[h.rel_right h'] T₂' :=
(add_comm _).trans ((add_rel_left _ h').trans (add_comm _))
open AddCond in
lemma add_assoc' {T₁ T₂ T₃ : 𝓣.TensorIndex} {h' : AddCond T₂ T₃} (h : AddCond T₁ (T₂ +[h'] T₃)) :
T₁ +[h] (T₂ +[h'] T₃) = T₁ +[h'.of_add_right h] T₂ +[h'.add_left_of_add_right h] T₃ := by
refine ext ?_ ?_
simp only [add_toColorIndexList, ColorIndexList.contr_contr]
simp only [add_toColorIndexList, add_tensor, contr_toColorIndexList, addCondEquiv,
contr_add_tensor, map_add, mapIso_mapIso]
rw [_root_.add_assoc]
congr
rw [← contrPermEquiv_self_contr, ← contrPermEquiv_self_contr]
rw [contrPermEquiv_trans, contrPermEquiv_trans, contrPermEquiv_trans]
erw [← contrPermEquiv_self_contr, contrPermEquiv_trans]
open AddCond in
lemma add_assoc {T₁ T₂ T₃ : 𝓣.TensorIndex} {h' : AddCond T₁ T₂} (h : AddCond (T₁ +[h'] T₂) T₃) :
T₁ +[h'] T₂ +[h] T₃ = T₁ +[h'.add_right_of_add_left h] (T₂ +[h'.of_add_left h] T₃) := by
rw [add_assoc']
/-! TODO: Show that the product is well defined with respect to Rel. -/
/-!
## Product of `TensorIndex` allowed
-/
def ProdCond (T₁ T₂ : 𝓣.TensorIndex) : Prop :=
T₁.AppendCond T₂
namespace ProdCond
lemma to_AppendCond {T₁ T₂ : 𝓣.TensorIndex} (h : ProdCond T₁ T₂) :
T₁.AppendCond T₂ := h
end ProdCond
/-- The tensor product of two `TensorIndex`. -/
def prod (T₁ T₂ : 𝓣.TensorIndex)
(h : ProdCond T₁ T₂) : 𝓣.TensorIndex where
toColorIndexList := T₁ ++[h] T₂
tensor := 𝓣.mapIso IndexList.appendEquiv (T₁.colorMap_sumELim T₂) <|
𝓣.tensoratorEquiv _ _ (T₁.tensor ⊗ₜ[R] T₂.tensor)
@[simp]
lemma prod_toColorIndexList (T₁ T₂ : 𝓣.TensorIndex) (h : ProdCond T₁ T₂) :
(prod T₁ T₂ h).toColorIndexList = T₁.toColorIndexList ++[h] T₂.toColorIndexList := rfl
end TensorIndex
end
end TensorStructure